Metropolitan Data Visualization

The Volpe team started by looking at the daily VMT for all scenarios. This is done by combining seven DVMT outputs by location and type of mode. Percent change is calculated relative to the base scenario value.

DVMT Plots

Percent change

Across the study area, the largest DVMT changes in 2045 were observed for scenario K2 - Increasing Telecommuting, using the ‘relative employment’ input file in VisionEval to represent telecommuting. Increases in DVMT were observed for the ‘larger families’ scenario. Increases in DVMT were observed for the higher population growth scenario, which is as expected.

Absolute change

Energy Usage plots

Truck energy usage relative change

As with the DVMT values, just looking at energy usage for heavy trucks, the largest decrease was for scenario H2 - increasing hybrid and battery electric trucks. Substantial decreases were also observed for K2 - Increasing Telecommuting. This is worth noting because we would not necessarily expect heavy truck trips to be altered so much by telecommuting, so this deserves more investigation. Increases in heavy truck energy use were observed for the ‘L3 - Larger Families’ scenario.

The combination scenarios C02 and C05, which include the larger families as well as changes to employment, population, and fuels tax, had similar energy usage changes.

Metropolitan area data table

Household Data Visualization

In addition to examining the outputs which are reported at the entire metropolitan area level, we also investigated the outputs rolled up across all households.

Energy consumption - gasoline equivalents

Energy consumption - electricity

Again, scenario K2 - Increasing telecommuting had by far the biggest reduction in electricity use.

The combination scenarios C01 and CO4 both include the increased telecommuting scenario, along with electrification and increased funding to transit.

Emissions

The largest changes in emissions, summed up from the household CO[2]e values, was under the scenario with increasing electrification (2 different levels of increase tested), with the very substantial reductions as well observed under the K2 - increasing telecommuting scenario.

The best combination (C01) includes G2 + H2 + K2, meaning increased household vehicle electrification, increase in hybrid heavy trucks, along with increased telecommuting.

Mode Choice

The biggest reduction in vehicle usage (as measured by the median percent of trips at the household level for each of vehicle, bicycle, transit, and walking) was for the increased telecommuting scenario, along with the combination scenarios which included this telecommuting shift.

Ownership Costs

The greatest reduction in the costs to households of vehicle ownership was from the aging in place scenario.

Household level data table

Validation

The Volpe team also realized the need to validate the VisionEval output.

MWCOG DVMT

The VDOT team sent along daily VMT values in 2021 and 2045 from the MWCOG MOE Base model. These results include household car VMT, business car VMT, and car travel from other locations (such as motorists who live outside the area and are passing through it.

Here are the raw results from the MWCOG base model in 2045:

Jurisdiction Freeway Expressway Major Art. Minor Art. Collector Ramp All
Fairfax County 12,517,806 5,910,760 6,219,736 1,419,677 1,256,563 488,882 27,813,424
City of Fairfax 0 284,867 99,406 9,144 0 0 393,417
Falls Church 0 106,172 40,693 4,605 0 0 151,470

CROSSTAB ROW=FLAG COL=FTYPE VAR=_24VMTTRK

Jurisdiction Freeway Expressway Major Art. Minor Art. Collector Ramp All
Fairfax County 3,071,425 988,206 919,784 212,966 331,425 90,603 5,614,408
City of Fairfax 0 37,640 12,957 774 0 0 51,371
Falls Church 0 18,944 5,575 425 0 0 24,944

When you add all of the numbers up, you get 34,049,034 daily VMTs. This is about 4,000,000 higher than the VisionEval dvmt values. The chart below shows the percent differences with each of our scenarios.